[2.7] bpo-30850: test_bsddb3 tolerates smaller timeout on Windows#2840
Merged
vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:2.7from Jul 24, 2017
vstinner:bsddb_timeout27
Merged
[2.7] bpo-30850: test_bsddb3 tolerates smaller timeout on Windows#2840vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:2.7from vstinner:bsddb_timeout27
vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:2.7from
vstinner:bsddb_timeout27
Conversation
bpo-30850: On Windows, test04_lock_timeout2() now tolerates 50 ms whereas 100 ms is expected. The lock sometimes times out after only 58 ms. Windows clocks have a bad resolution and bad accuracy.
serhiy-storchaka
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bpo-30850: On Windows, test04_lock_timeout2() now tolerates 50 ms
whereas 100 ms is expected. The lock sometimes times out after only
58 ms. Windows clocks have a bad resolution and bad accuracy.
https://bugs.python.org/issue30850