feat: Support nested collection types (Array/Set of Array/Set) (#5947)#6132
Open
soooojinlee wants to merge 6 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
Open
feat: Support nested collection types (Array/Set of Array/Set) (#5947)#6132soooojinlee wants to merge 6 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
soooojinlee wants to merge 6 commits intofeast-dev:masterfrom
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Contributor
|
@soooojinlee , this looks good. Just need to respond to Devin feedback and update branch and I can approve. |
…-dev#5947) Add support for 2-level nested collection types: Array(Array(T)), Array(Set(T)), Set(Array(T)), and Set(Set(T)). - Add 4 generic ValueType enums (LIST_LIST, LIST_SET, SET_LIST, SET_SET) backed by RepeatedValue proto messages - Persist inner type info in Field tags (feast:nested_inner_type), following the existing Struct schema tag pattern - Handle edge cases: empty inner collections, Set dedup at inner level, depth limit enforcement (2 levels max) - Add proto/JSON/remote transport serialization support - Add 25 unit tests covering all combinations and edge cases Signed-off-by: Soojin Lee <lsjin0602@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io>
- Fix remote online store read path to use declared feature types from FeatureView instead of ValueType.UNKNOWN, which fails for nested collection types (LIST_LIST, LIST_SET, SET_LIST, SET_SET) - Add Nested Collection Types section to type-system.md with type table, usage examples, and empty-inner-collection→None limitation docs Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io>
…for nested collection types - Add nested list handling in proto_json from_json_object (list of lists was raising ParseError since no branch matched list-typed elements) - Fix pa_to_feast_value_type to recognize nested list PyArrow types (list<item: list<item: T>>) instead of crashing with KeyError - Replace silent String fallback in _str_to_feast_type with ValueError to surface corrupted tag values instead of silently losing type info - Strengthen test coverage: type str roundtrip, inner value verification, multi-value batch, proto JSON roundtrip, PyArrow nested type inference Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io>
Use getattr/CopyFrom instead of **dict unpacking for ProtoValue construction to satisfy mypy's strict type checking. Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io>
…n edge case - Add __eq__/__hash__ to Array and Set so inner element types are compared (previously Array(Array(String)) == Array(Array(Int32)) was True) - Fix nested collection detection in proto_json when first element is None by using any() fallback instead of only checking value[0] Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io>
… coverage - Remove 2-level depth restriction from Array and Set constructors to support unbounded nesting per maintainer request - Make _convert_nested_collection_to_proto() recursive for 3+ levels - Update error message for nested type inference to guide users toward explicit Field dtype declaration - Add 3+ level tests for Field roundtrip, str roundtrip, and PyArrow conversion Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: soojin <soojin@dable.io>
58dff41 to
c1ce5d8
Compare
Author
|
Addressed Devin review feedback and also removed the 2-level depth restriction for nested collection types — now supports unbounded nesting depth as discussed in #5947. |
Contributor
@soooojinlee , thanks so much for working on this. My question is if unbounded, why not just implement like map. Reduce to just |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Add 2-level nested collection types:
Array(Array(T)),Array(Set(T)),Set(Array(T)),Set(Set(T))Changes
LIST_LIST/LIST_SET/SET_LIST/SET_SET) withRepeatedValuefieldsArray/Setmutual nesting with 2-level depth limit, preserve inner type viafeast:nested_inner_typetagfeature_type_mapinstead ofValueType.UNKNOWNStringfallback in_str_to_feast_typewithValueErrorWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #5947
Misc
The UUID type feature PR was developed first and uses ValueType enum values 36-41. This PR uses 36-39 for nested collection types. If this PR is merged first, the UUID branch will need to reassign its enum values to avoid conflicts.